OAFP 9685 - Ethics and Public Policy

Is there a universal definition of good governance? This course addresses how ethical considerations can guide democratic regulation and policymaking to meet global societal challenges. It explores the intersection of ethics and public policy, emphasizing the implications of emerging technologies like artificial intelligence and biotechnology.

This course examines the vital relationship between ethics and public policy amidst rapid technological changes. Through case studies, simulations, and hands-on exercises, students will apply ethical theories to real-world scenarios, enhancing their ability to devise ethically sound policies that address complex societal challenges.

Key topics include:

• The ethical considerations of new technologies on public policy, exploring issues of biotechnology, surveillance, and privacy.
• Strategies for ethical stakeholder engagement, emphasizing equity, transparency, and accountability in policy processes.
• The dynamics of ethical governance in technological advancement, fostering responsible innovation and effective regulatory practices.

The course aims to develop a sophisticated understanding of ethical decision-making in governance, equipping students with the skills to influence both public and private sectors. Through engaged learning and critical debate, students will emerge prepared to navigate and shape the ethical contours of contemporary public policy.

To ensure comprehensive understanding and practical application of the course material, promoting both individual and group learning outcomes, the assessment of this course will be composed of:

• Oral Exam (50% of the grade): Teams of five students will suggest topics, which must be approved by the professor, related to the course content (main themes) introduced in the first class. Each team will engage in a structured debate, presenting opposing views on their approved topic. This format is designed to enhance understanding through critical discussion and collaborative analysis.
• Written Assignment (50% of the grade): Using the same teams and topic as the oral exam, students will collaboratively write a concise essay. This assignment will be due by a specified date at the semester's end, allowing students to further explore and articulate the concepts discussed in the debate. Participation Bonus (up to 2 points): Active participation in class discussions on case studies will earn students up to 2 bonus points. This incentive encourages engagement and fosters a dynamic learning environment.