F1IS 4375 - Anticipating Security Risks and Threats: Unpacking the expectations-impact gap
F1IS 4375 · Semestre d'automne 2026-2027
- Langue d'enseignement
- English
- Type d'enseignement
- Cours séminaire
- Nombre d'heures
- 24
- Crédits
- 6
Informations
Descriptif
In an era of radical uncertainty, the demand for accurate forecasting is higher than ever due to political, military, environmental, and technological risks. Despite the proliferation of forecasting methods, including AI and expert knowledge, practitioners and institutions struggle to anticipate and address future security issues. Strategic surprises like the Covid-19 pandemic, the Russian invasion of Ukraine, and transatlantic trade wars illustrate this challenge. This course explores why forecasting often falls short and how to improve its integration into decision-making. It combines discussions on the politics of forecasting with practical exercises to help students understand and overcome biases, making it relevant for those interested in security forecasting and emerging research in this field.
Learning Outcomes:
- Situate, compare, and critically assess forecasting methods currently used by practitioners of international security
- Understand why the “effectiveness” of forecasting is not only a question of precision but also of ideational context and organizational politics
- Experiment and improve their own forecasting skills by designing a training exercise and discuss its results with the course members and the teacher
Professional Skills:
- Prediction and forecasting methods used by international security practitioners and institutions
- The articulation between academic arguments and participant observation to improve understanding of the concrete dynamics of risk anticipation
- Design and conduct of anticipation exercises
Pré-requis
There are no special prerequisites, other than an open mind.
Format pédagogique
Orally after the group assignments, written feedback on the individual assignments
Mode de validation
- 1 group assignment: oral presentation 20%
- 1 group assignment: elaboration, conduct and analysis of an in-class anticipation exercise: 50%
- 1 individual assignment: literature review essay on the question “What is the best way of anticipating future security risks and threats?”: 20%
- Oral participation in class, based on the core readings 10%
Charge de travail
- In Class Presence: 2 hours a week / 24 hours a semester
- Reading and Preparation for Class: 4 hours a week / 48 hours a semester
- Research and Preparation for Group Work: 3 hours a week / 36 hours a semester
- Research and Writing for Individual Assessments: 3 hours a week / 36 hours a semester
Lectures
Lectures principales 4
-
Andersson, J. (2018). The future of the world: futurology, futurists, and the struggle for the post-Cold War imagination. Oxford University Press.
-
Colonomos, A. (2016). Selling the future: the perils of predicting global politics. Oxford University Press.
-
Meyer, C. O., De Franco, C., & Otto, F. (2019). Warning about war: conflict, persuasion and foreign policy. Cambridge University Press.
-
Wenger, A., Jasper, U., & Dunn Cavelty, M. (Eds.). (2020). The politics and science of prevision: governing and probing the future. Routledge.
Unités pédagogiques
| N° d'UP | Type d'UP | Unités pédagogiques | Enseignants | Nombre d'heures | Crédits |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19601 | Cours séminaire | Anticipating Security Risks and Threats: Unpacking the expectations-impact gap | Eric SANGAR | 24 | 6 |
Enseignants
- Eric SANGAR
Dans les maquettes
- Master in International Security - Fall 2026 (Semester 1)ÉCOLE DES AFFAIRES INTERNATIONALES (PSIA)
Contacts et ressources
- Contact pédagogique
- SOROOSH Homa