K6ET 2065 - Urban Futures: STS and the Technologies of the Transition
K6ET 2065 · Semestre d'automne 2026-2027
- Langue d'enseignement
- English
- Type d'enseignement
- Cours magistral
- Nombre d'heures
- 12
- Crédits
- 2
Informations
Descriptif
Governing urban ecological transitions involves choosing between multiple technical possibilities to guide the future development of urban environments or to modify existing environments. Decision-makers need to assess the effects and performances of different technologies while grasping their political significance and their social and organizational consequences. In domain as diverse as energy supply, infrastructure or biodiversity management, the recent history of urban ecological transitions is riddled with failed - yet technologically relevant, initiatives. By adopting a socio-technical approach (STS), attentive to the materiality of urban environments, and to the social and political configurations underpinning technological choices, the objective of this course is to offer an understanding of the failures and successes of urban ecological transitions projects. To understand their technological trajectories and their deployment, the mapping of socio-technical controversies, an approach developed over the past thirty years in different academic institutions, offers an effective method. The ambition of this course is therefore threefold: (a) to provide students with an understanding of the recent history of urban development in Europe through an STS lens, (b) to expand or reinforce their urban technical culture and (c) to equip them with concepts and methods to study socio-technical controversies, allowing them to critically evaluate the technological choices that support urban ecological transition projects. The lectures will reflect on different European experiences taken in various urban contexts, while the workshop sessions will allow students to focus on an urban ecological transition project of their choice and critically deconstruct the technological choices and their social and political implications. The course is organized over a period of 6 weeks (6 sessions of 2 hours) and will combine group work, written statements, and presentations.
Pré-requis
The course does not require any prior knowledge and welcome all disciplinary backgrounds, from architecture and civil engineering to social sciences and environmental studies.
Format pédagogique
The course will combine lectures and reading seminars to introduce and discuss the main concepts and methods. It also includes project-oriented sessions.
Mode de validation
The course will be validated by (a) a written report to be submitted at the end of the six weeks workshop and (b) a final presentation.
Charge de travail
The workload involves intensive work during the six sessions. Students will also be asked to dedicate some time to desk research between each session and do some group work to progress in the exploration of their own controversy.
Lectures
Lectures principales 3
-
- 1/ Jonathan Rutherford, Olivier Coutard (2014). Urban Energy Transitions: Places, Processes and Politics of Socio-technical Change. Urban Studies. 51(7):1353-1377. Doi:10.1177/0042098013500090
-
- 2/ Mike Hodson, Simon Marvin (2010).Can cities shape socio-technical transitions and how would we know if they were? Cities, (Research Policy) 39(4):477-485. Doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.020
-
- 4/ Whatmore SJ. Mapping knowledge controversies: science, democracy and the redistribution of expertise. Progress in Human Geography. 2009;33(5):587-598. doi:10.1177/0309132509339841
Lectures secondaires 6
-
- 3/ Stissing Jensen, J., Cashmore, M., Späth, P. (Eds.), 2020. The politics of urban sustainability sransitions: knowledge, power and governance, First issued in paperback. ed, Routledge research in sustainable urbanism. Routledge, London New York.
-
- Albena Yaneva and Liam Heaphy (2012). Urban controversies and the making of the social. Architectural Research Quarterly, 16/2012 :29-36. Doi:10.1017/S1359135512000267
-
- Coutard O, Guy S. STS and the City: Politics and Practices of Hope. Science, Technology, & Human Values. 2007;32(6):713-734. doi:10.1177/0162243907303600
-
- Hommels A. Studying Obduracy in the City: Toward a Productive Fusion between Technology Studies and Urban Studies. Science, Technology, & Human Values. 2005;30(3):323-351. doi:10.1177/0162243904271759
-
- Venturini, T. 2009. Diving in magma: How to explore controversies with actor-network theory. Public Understanding of Science 19(3): 258–273.
-
-Rutherford, J., 2020. Redeploying urban infrastructure: the politics of urban socio-technical futures. Springer Nature.
Unités pédagogiques
| N° d'UP | Type d'UP | Unités pédagogiques | Enseignants | Nombre d'heures | Crédits |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15066 | Cours magistral | Urban Futures: STS and the Technologies of the Transition | Martine DROZDZ | 12 | 2 |
Enseignants
- Martine DROZDZ
Dans les maquettes
Contacts et ressources
- Contact pédagogique
- SUSANA-DELPECH Béatrice