DSPO 25A95 - A Democratic Deficit? Legitimacy and Representation in the EU

DSPO 25A95 · Fall semester 2026-2027

Language of tuition
English
Course type
Cours séminaire
Number of hours
24
Credits
5

Information

Description

This course examines EU legitimacy through the lens of democracy and citizen representation. It analyses representation mechanisms at European and national levels — the Council, the European Parliament, direct elections, and deliberative democracy — and explores public opinion, Euroscepticism, political crises, and referendums. In the final weeks, students develop a reform proposal to strengthen EU democracy.

Learning objectives: understand citizen representation in multilevel governance; form and defend a position on the EU's democratic deficit; analyse how European public opinion and identity are shaped; critically engage with academic research; think creatively about institutional reform; and provide constructive feedback on peers' work

Prerequisites

Basic knowledge of the European Union and its institutions. Ability to read academic texts in English.

Teaching format

Twelve weekly two-hour seminars. Sessions combine a short instructor-led introduction with structured discussion of the required readings, organised around four thematic parts. Students complete a preparatory survey before four sessions. The final session is devoted to student presentations of reform proposals, with instructor and peer feedback

Assessment

Four pre-seminar surveys (40%); recorded oral presentation and written peer feedback (20%); written reform proposal approx. 3,000 words (40%).

Readings

Main readings 5

  1. Dahl, R.A. (1994). A democratic dilemma. Political Science Quarterly, 109(1), pp.23–34.

    Read online

  2. Follesdal, A. and Hix, S. (2006). Why there is a democratic deficit in the EU. JCMS, 44(3), pp.533–562.

    Read online

  3. Hix, S. (2013). What’s Wrong with the European Union and How to Fix It, ch. 1. Wiley.

    Read online

  4. Hobolt, S.B. and De Vries, C.E. (2016). Public support for European integration. ARPS, 19(1), pp.413–432.

    Borrow

  5. Hobolt, S.B. and Tilley, J. (2014). Blaming Europe?, ch. 2. Oxford University Press.

    Read online

Further readings 4

  1. Bruter, M. (2003). Winning hearts and minds for Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 36(10), pp.1148–1179.

    Read online

  2. Hobolt, S.B. (2016). The Brexit vote. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(9), pp.1259–1277.

    Read online

  3. Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2009). A postfunctionalist theory of European integration. BJPS, 39(1), pp.1–23.

    Read online

  4. White, J. (2015). Emergency Europe. Political Studies, 63(2), pp.300–318.

    Read online

Teaching units

Unit no.Unit type Teaching unitsTeachers Number of hoursCredits
20163Cours séminaire A Democratic Deficit? Legitimacy and Representation in the EU Tom HUNTER245

Teachers

  • Tom HUNTER

In the curricula

Contacts and resources

Contact
NICOULEAU Svetlana