KCOE 4435 - Social influence, resilience and digital self-efficacy

KCOE 4435 · Spring semester 2025-2026

Language of tuition
English
Course type
Cours séminaire
Number of hours
12
Credits
2

Information

Description

This six-session series aims to explore how psychological science can help communicators design

ethical, resilient, and evidence-based strategies in an age of misinformation, polarisation, and

AI-mediated influence. Drawing from social psychology, cognitive science, and communication

research, the course introduces students to the principles of persuasion and resistance to persuasion,

translating theory into practical tools for the modern communication landscape. The series integrates

insights from my recent work on inoculation theory, prebunking, and digital self-efficacy. Students will

gain both conceptual grounding and applied skills for designing communication that informs,

protects, and empowers citizens in the digital age.

Prerequisites

No specific prior knowledge required. Basic familiarity with social psychology or communication is helpful but not essential.

Teaching format

Short lectures, guided discussions, case study work, and interactive exercises. Students apply concepts directly through weekly readings, group debate, and practical analysis of real-world incidences of social influence.

Assessment

Evaluation is based on two components.

  • Active contribution to seminar discussions, demonstrating engagement with course readings and concepts (20%).
  • A case-study assignment based on short-term engagement with an AI-powered system (e.g. a social companion or generative communication product). Students submit a four-page analytical paper outlining key benefits, risks, and recommendations, supported by transcripts or excerpts from the interaction (80%).

Workload

Weekly required readings, active participation, and preparation for the final project. Estimate: 3 hours independent work per week.

Readings

Main readings 5

  1. 1Basol, M., Roozenbeek, J., Berriche, M., Uenal, F., McClanahan, W. P., & van der Linden, S. (2021). Towards psychological herd immunity: Cross-cultural evidence for two prebunking interventions against COVID-19 misinformation. Big Data & Society.

    Read online

  2. Basol, Melisa, 'Designing AI for humans: preventing manipulation and protecting digital agency' (13 Aug. 2025), in Sam De Silva, and others (eds), Expert Essentials

    Borrow

  3. Ecker, U. K., Lewandowsky, S., Cook, J., Schmid, P., Fazio, L. K., Brashier, N., ... & Amazeen, M. A. (2022). The psychological drivers of misinformation belief and its resistance to correction. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(1), 13-29.

    Borrow

  4. Kozyreva, et al. (2024). Toolbox of Interventions Against Online Misinformation and Manipulation. Nature Human Behavior.

    Read online

  5. van der Linden, S. (2022). Misinformation: susceptibility, spread, and interventions to immunize the public. Nature Medicine, 28, 460–467.

    Read online

Further readings 12

  1. Appel, R. E., Roozenbeek, J., Rayburn-Reeves, R., Basol, M., Corbin, J., Compton, J., & van der Linden, S. (2025). Psychological inoculation improves resilience to and reduces willingness to share vaccine misinformation. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 29830.

    Read online

  2. Axelsson, C.-A. W., Nygren, T., Roozenbeek, J., & van der Linden, S. (2025). Bad News in the civics classroom: How serious gameplay fosters teenagers’ ability to discern misinformation techniques. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 57(5), 992–1018.

  3. Carroll, M., Chan, A., Ashton, H., & Krueger, D. (2023, October). Characterizing manipulation from AI systems. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Conference on Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization (pp. 1-13).

    Read online

  4. Goldstein, J., et. al. (2023). Generative Language Models and Automated Influence Operations:Emerging Threats and Potential Mitigations. Stanford Internet Observatory. Read only: Sections 1-1.2, 3.1, 4-4.1.3

    Read online

  5. Hassoun et al. (2024). The Influencer Next Door: How Misinformation Creators Use GenAI. ArXiv, forthcoming New Media and Society

    Read online

  6. Klincewicz, M., Alfano, M., & Fard, A. E. (2025). Slopaganda: The interaction between propaganda and generative AI. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.01560.

    Read online

  7. M. Sultan, A.N. Tump, N. Ehmann, P. Lorenz-Spreen, R. Hertwig, A. Gollwitzer, & R.H.J.M. Kurvers, Susceptibility to online misinformation: A systematic meta-analysis of demographic and psychological factors, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 121 (47) e2409329121, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2409329121 (2024).

  8. Milano, S., Taddeo, M. & Floridi, L. Recommender systems and their ethical challenges. AI & Soc 35, 957–967 (2020).

    Read online

  9. Pataranutaporn, P., Liu, R., Finn, E., & Maes, P. (2023). Influencing human–AI interaction by priming beliefs about AI can increase perceived trustworthiness, empathy and effectiveness. Nature Machine Intelligence, 5(10), 1076-1086.

    Borrow

  10. Professional fact checks: Porter E, Wood TJ. (2021). The global effectiveness of fact-checking: Evidence from simultaneous experiments in Argentina, Nigeria, South Africa, and the United Kingdom. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA.

    Read online

  11. Simchon, A., Zipori, T., Teitelbaum, L., Lewandowsky, S., & van der Linden, S. (2025). A Signal Detection Theory Meta-Analysis of Psychological Inoculation Against Misinformation. Current Opinion in Psychology, 102194.

    Read online

  12. Uscinski, J., et al. (2022). The psychological and political correlates of conspiracy theory beliefs. Sci Rep 12, 21672

    Read online

Teaching units

Unit no.Unit type Teaching unitsTeachers Number of hoursCredits
59004Cours séminaire Social influence, resilience and digital self-efficacy Melisa BASOL122

Teachers

  • Melisa BASOL

In the curricula

Contacts and resources

Contact
KOBBI Ahlème