K2SP 3715 - From Political Behavior to Political Dynamics: A Cognitive Approach to the Political Sphere

K2SP 3715 · Spring semester 2025-2026

Language of tuition
English
Course type
Cours magistral
Number of hours
24
Credits
4

Information

Description

This course offers a panorama of how cognitive approaches can help to understand the dynamics of

the political sphere. Through an in-depth analysis of key issues related to political dynamics, it

introduces the main cognitive mechanisms relevant for both the analysis of political behaviour and the

evaluation of public policies. To this end, the course will be organised around a combination of formal

lectures and student-led discussions on the application of psychological insights to concrete situations

and actual public policies. The first half of the semester will be devoted to understanding key

democratic issues such as political participation and polarisation, and the second half to analysing

larger social dynamics such as attitudes to inequality and social trends. Importantly, the ethical and

methodological aspects of this approach will be discussed throughout the semester.

Prerequisites

None

Teaching format

This course aims to be as engaging and interactive as possible. Students will have regular opportunities

to reflect on the cognitive insights and two sessions will be dedicated to discussing their behavioural

analyses.

Assessment

10% class participation

40% case study presentations (cognitive analysis of a concrete issue, twice per semester, collective

work)

50% Final paper - writing a cognitive analysis of a real policy issue (3000 words - individual work)

Readings

Main readings 4

  1. Mercier, H. (2017). How gullible are we? A review of the evidence from psychology and social science. Review of General Psychology, 21(2), 103-122.

    Read online

  2. Payne, B. K., & Hannay, J. W. (2021). Implicit bias reflects systemic racism. Trends in cognitive sciences, 25(11), 927-936.

  3. Starmans, C., Sheskin, M., & Bloom, P. (2017). Why people prefer unequal societies. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(4), 1-7.

  4. Todorov, A., Mandisodza, A. N., Goren, A., & Hall, C. C. (2005). Inferences of competence from faces predict election outcomes. Science, 308(5728), 1623-1626.

    Read online

Further readings 5

  1. Aarøe, L., & Petersen, M. B. (2014). Crowding out culture: Scandinavians and Americans agree on social welfare in the face of deservingness cues. The Journal of Politics, 76(3), 684- 697.

    Read online

  2. Bastardoz, N., & Van Vugt, M. (2019). The nature of followership: Evolutionary analysis and review. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), 81-95.

    Read online

  3. Crowder-Meyer, M., Gadarian, S. K., & Trounstine, J. (2020). Voting can be hard, information helps. Urban Affairs Review, 56(1), 124-153.Kelly, D., & Setman, S. (2020). The psychology of normative cognition.

    Borrow

  4. El Zein, M., Bahrami, B., & Hertwig, R. (2019). Shared responsibility in collective decisions. Nature human behaviour, 3(6), 554-559.

    Borrow

  5. Sijilmassi, A., Safra, L., & Baumard, N. (2024). ‘Our Roots Run Deep’: Historical Myths as Culturally Evolved Technologies for Coalitional Recruitment. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1-44.

Teaching units

Unit no.Unit type Teaching unitsTeachers Number of hoursCredits
57357Cours magistral From Political Behavior to Political Dynamics: A Cognitive Approach to the Political Sphere Lou SAFRA244

Teachers

  • Lou SAFRA

In the curricula

Contacts and resources

Contact
SCHITTONE Delphine