K0SP 2015 - Methology and Epistemology for Political Theorists

K0SP 2015 · Spring semester 2025-2026

Language of tuition
English
Course type
Cours séminaire
Number of hours
24
Credits
5

Information

Description

THE AIM of this course is to inspire you, as well as to develop your critical capacities as political thinkers and writers. By carefully analyzing the work of a diverse set of brilliant and influential philosophers, you will get the chance to examine different ways of doing political theory, different solutions to problems of knowledge and method, and different ways of creating and presenting complex arguments. This will enable you to become more self-conscious about the ways you think and write, as well as more aware of the subtleties of style, voice and methodology in normative political thought.

I am in the process of rethinking the reading list, so have not yet decided what I will keep from the last time I taught it in Autumn 2023. I love most of the things we read then (and in previous years) but there are new discussions in philosophical methodology that it might be nice to explore. On the other hand, it would be sad to lose the sections on philosophical approaches to race and gender, as I realise students don’t often get a chance to discuss such issues. So I need to think and talk to some previous and current students to see what they would most like.

There will be no readings for the first week of the course. Instead we will discuss the aims of the course, the readings that you will be doing, and the way to approach them.

Prerequisites

None. Open to students from other Schools at Sciences Po as well as other Specialities.

Teaching format

Participative Seminar – you have to take part in class and read the texts before hand.

Assessment

2 essays over the course of the term.

Workload

Normally at least two articles a week or the equivalent. Some of these are really quite difficult, but students seem to have survived and to have enjoyed the class thus far – so hopefully you will as well.

Readings

Main readings 3

  1. Barbara Herman, “Could It Be Worth Thinking About Kant on Sex and Marriage?” in A Mind of One’s Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity, ed. Anthony and Witt (Moodle)

  2. Jakob ELSTER, « How Outlandish Can Imaginary Cases Be? », Journal of Applied Philosophy 28 :3, 2011, p. 241-259

  3. Jakob Elster’s critique of ‘bizarre’ thought experiments

Further readings 3

  1. Barbara Herman, “Could It Be Worth Thinking About Kant on Sex and Marriage?” in A Mind of One’s Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity, ed. Anthony and Witt (Moodle)

  2. Beerbohm et al. ‘On the democratic limits of field experiments’

  3. ed. Adrian Blau, Methods in Analytic Political Philosophy

    Borrow

Teaching units

Unit no.Unit type Teaching unitsTeachers Number of hoursCredits
54119Cours séminaire Methology and Epistemology for Political Theorists Annabelle LEVER245

Teachers

  • Annabelle LEVER

In the curricula

Contacts and resources

Contact
KREMER Marie-Hélène