F1GD 4455 - Nuclear Weapons Policy in International Relations (New Course)

***UPDATED for 2024/25***

This course leads students on an exploration of nuclear weapons policies. It is structured in four blocks: a first section examines the origins and evolution of nuclear policies following the discovery of radioactivity and the development of nuclear weapons. In other words, it looks at the “nuclear revolution” and analyses how it changed our world, giving shape to the historical era known as the Cold War. This is followed by an overview of the history of arms control, both in its multilateral and bilateral dimensions. In a second step, we examine the intellectual foundations of nuclear possession, on the one hand, and the idea of nuclear disarmament, which is followed by an exploration of key debates in the field, such the “nuclear taboo” and the risks posed by nuclear proliferation. The fundamentals of nuclear weapons history and the academic debate now gives way to current affairs and the policy perspective. The role of two key organisations is revisited: the United Nations, which bears key responsibility for disarmament and arms control, and the EU, which has recently upgraded its role in the field. Practitioners invited as guest speakers share their experiences at each of these organisations. The course also explores the use of sanctions to stem proliferation, and concludes by looking into the meaning(s) ascribed to nuclear weapons in international relations.

Learning Outcomes

1. Understand how nuclear weapons and their representation are used in today's security world.

2. Develop a detailed knowledge of a range of global security, foreign policy and normative controversies associated to these weapons.

3. Learn to analyse the efforts to control nuclear weapons and their outcomes, using a multidisciplinary perspective.

4. Hone the ability to synthesise complex information in a concise and policy-relevant manner.

5. Explore the key ethical, political and practical considerations at play in international nuclear weapons policy

Professional Skills

Public speaking, analysis, interpreting data from a range of sources, concise writing style.

Clara PORTELA
Séminaire
English
- In Class Presence: 4 hours a week / 24 hours a semester

- Online learning activities: 5 hours a semester

- Reading and Preparation for Class: 20 hours a semester

- Research and Preparation for Group Work: 5 hours a semester

- Research and Writing for Individual Assessments: 20 hours a semester

None
Spring 2024-2025
Written work: 50%

Class presentation: 40%

Participation 10% (requires students to participate in discussions and not just attend the class)

Feedback will be provided in verbal or written format after the presentations and written assignments

1. Walker, W. (2000) Nuclear Order and Disorder', International Affairs, 76(4), 703–724.
2. Berkowitz, B. (1985) Proliferation, Deterrence, and the Likelihood of Nuclear War'. Journal of Conflict Resolution 29(1), 112–136.
3. Sagan, S. (1997) Why do states build nuclear weapons? Three models in search of a bomb', International Security, 21(3), 54–86.
4. Ritchie, N. (2019) A hegemonic nuclear order: Understanding the Ban Treaty and the power politics of nuclear weapons'. Contemporary Security Policy, 40(4), 409–434.
5. Considine, L. (2017) The standardization of catastrophe: Nuclear disarmament, the Humanitarian Initiative and the politics of the unthinkable'. European Journal of International Relations, 23(3), 681-702.
1. Horovitz, L. (2014) Beyond Pessimism: Why the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons will not collapse', Journal of Strategic Studies, 38(1–2), 126–158.
2. Gottemoeller, R. (2020) Rethinking Nuclear Arms Control', Washington Quarterly, 43(3), 139–159.
3. Schell, J. (2000) The folly of arms control'. Foreign Affairs 79(5), 22–46.
4. Tannenwald, N. (2013) Justice and fairness in the nuclear non-proliferation regime'. Ethics & International Affairs, 27 (3), 299–317.
5. Morgenthau, H. (1964) The four paradoxes of nuclear strategy', American Political Science Review 58(1), 23-35.