Digital technology permeates many people's lives. Most of us are surrounded by
digital technology, which impacts what information we consume and how we interact
with each other. However, it is becoming increasingly clear that technology does not
affect everyone in the same manner. Mounting newspaper headlines of faulty facial
recognition or discrimination in algorithmic welfare systems expose harms along the
lines of gender, race, class and many other variables. While much of digital
technology seems like a new development, there is a reckoning that in its
perpetuation of pre-existing, “analogue” injustices, it forms part of a historical
continuity. With this in mind, this course takes a closer look at how the intersection
between technology and race as a social construct influences our interactions with
each other as well as the structures we live in.
Aisha KADIRI
Séminaire
English
Autumn and Spring 2024-2025
Class participation (15%)
First group presentation (10%)
Second group presentation (20%)
Individual essay (20%)
Group essay (35%)
Amrute, S., Singh, R. & Guzmán, R. L. (2022). A Primer on AI in/from the Majority World. Data & Society. https://datasociety.net/library/a-primer-on-ai-in-from-the- majority-world/
Babu, A. & Shahin, S. (2021). Not Ready for Prime Time': Biometrics and Biopolitics in the (Un)Making of California's Facial Recognition Ban. In P. Verdegem (Ed.), AI For Everyone? Critical Perspectives (pp. 223-245). University of Westminster Press.
Benjamin, R. (2019). Chapter 5: Retooling Solidarity, Reimagining Justice. In Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code (pp. 109-127). Polity.
Browne, S. (2015). Branding Blackness: Biometric Technology and the Surveillance of Blackness. In Dark Matters: On the Surveillance of Blackness (pp. 89-129). Duke University Press.
Combahee River Collective. (1977). The Combahee River Collective Statement. https://americanstudies.yale.edu/sites/default/files/files/Keyword%20Coalition_Readin gs.pdf
Constantaras, E., Geiger, G. Braun, J.-C., Mehrotra, D. & Aungs, H. (March 6, 2023). Inside the Suspicion Machine. Wired. https://www.wired.com/story/welfare-state- algorithms/#intcid=_wired-verso-hp-trending_145b7ab1-a36c-4aca-8059- 42e2e8304e38_pop
D'Ignazio, C. & Klein, L. F. (2020). Introduction: Why Data Science Needs Feminism. In Data Feminism (pp. 1-19). The MIT Press.
Eubanks, V. (2018). Chapter 4: The Allegheny Algorithm. In Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor (pp.). St. Martin's Press.
Hall, S. (1997). Race, the Floating Signifier. Media Education Foundation. https://www.mediaed.org/transcripts/Stuart-Hall-Race-the-Floating-Signifier- Transcript.pdf
Haslanger, S. (2019). Tracing the Sociopolitical Reality of Race. In J. Glasgow, S. Haslanger, C. Jeffers & Q. Spencer (Eds.), What is Race? Four Philosophical Views (pp. 4-37). Oxford University Press.
Mhlambi, S. (2020). From Rationality to Relationality: Ubuntu as an Ethical & Human Rights Framework for Artificial Intelligence Governance. Carr Center Discussion Paper, 1-26. https://carrcenter.hks.harvard.edu/files/cchr/files/ccdp_2020- 009_sabelo
Monash University. (n.d.). How to build an essay. https://www.monash.edu/learnhq/excel-at-writing/how-to-write.../essay/how-to-build- an-essay
Scheuerman, M. K., Pape, M. & Hanna, A. (2021). Auto-essentialization: Gender in automated facial analysis as extended colonial project. Big Data & Society, July–December, 1–15. doi: 10.1177/20539517211053712