DSOC 25A21 - SNA2: Social Network Analysis in the digital age

This course aims to introduce students to the field of Social Network Analysis (SNA). Social networks are ubiquitous nowadays, SNA emerged in the 1960s as a vibrant social science specialty trying to give substance to individuals, not through their inner psychological and demographic, or professional characteristics but through the relationships they entertain with their social environment. The first objective of this class will be to introduce the concepts and metrics designed and theorized by this specific stream of sociology and test how operative they still are in our connected environment. How useful are centrality or cohesion measures today? What can we learn about our current online world with concepts forged in the '60s and the '70s like homophily, transitivity, cohesion, diffusion processes? To do so, this course will examine the seminal papers in SNA. However, this intellectual journey will be complemented by a more hands-on approach, as half of the course will be devoted to teaching the students basic operations in Python such that they can collect data from digital social media platforms before modeling, measuring, and visualizing this data using recent network analysis libraries. We will put the ancient concepts of SNA to the test and assess how fruitful they are in understanding online interaction data. No prior coding experience is required as we will extensively use AI capacities (such as Gemini, directly available in Google Colab notebooks) to assist with coding. The class will alternate readings of historical sociology papers and more contemporaneous articles typical of the digital age mixing concepts from SNA in the larger realm of computational social sciences. Most classes will be split into three parts: the discussion around a scientific paper, a lecture about a new SNA-related concept, and a third part where students will be invited to experiment on their own laptops with the newly introduced concepts, metrics, or algorithms with empirical data.
Jean-Philippe COINTET
Séminaire
English
No previous knowledge in either graph theory or programming is required. The class will still require to read papers adopting formal approaches. So students should be ready to engage with such content.
Spring 2024-2025
You will be asked to read and present a scientific paper in line with the topic of the session. One paper per week will be presented by two or three students. Presentations will be evaluated (50% of the final grade) Additionally, a collective project will be conducted by students who are expected to build a network from social media platforms and analyze its structure (50% of the final grade) Student engaged during the semester can be rewarded by an extra point.
Borgatti SP, Mehra A, Brass DJ, Labianca G. Network analysis in the social sciences. science. 2009 Feb 13;323(5916):892-5.
Rajkumar K, Saint-Jacques G, Bojinov I, Brynjolfsson E, Aral S. A causal test of the strength of weak ties. Science. 2022 Sep 16;377(6612):1304-10.
Watts DJ, Strogatz SH. Collective dynamics of small-world'networks. nature. 1998 Jun;393(6684):440-2.
Barberá P. Birds of the same feather tweet together: Bayesian ideal point estimation using Twitter data. Political analysis. 2015;23(1):76-91.
De Vaan M, Stark D, Vedres B. Game changer: The topology of creativity. American Journal of Sociology. 2015 Jan 1;120(4):1144-94.
Kossinets G, Watts DJ. Empirical analysis of an evolving social network. science. 2006 Jan 6;311(5757):88-90.
Granovetter, Mark S. "The strength of weak ties." American journal of sociology 78.6 (1973): 1360-1380.
Milgram S. The small world problem. Psychology today. 1967 May 3;2(1):60-7.
McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual review of sociology. 2001 Jan 1:415-44.
Freeman, Linton C. "Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification." Social networks 1.3 (1978): 215-239.
Bonacich P. Power and centrality: A family of measures. American journal of sociology. 1987 Mar 1;92(5):1170-82.
Burt, Ronald S. "Structural holes and good ideas." American journal of sociology 110.2 (2004): 349-399.
Doreian P. An intuitive introduction to blockmodeling with examples. Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique. 1999 Jan;61(1):5-34.
Coleman J, Katz E, Menzel H. The diffusion of an innovation among physicians. Sociometry. 1957 Dec 1;20(4):253-70.
Breiger, Ronald L. 1974. "The Duality of Persons and Groups." Social Forces 53:181-90.