DHUM 25A20 - Normative political theory and democracy
Is democracy desirable? Is it legitimate? If so, why? And what makes a political system democratic in the first place? These are some of the questions we might ask when we deal with democratic laws or policies with which we disagree or when we wonder whether or to what extent our own regimes are indeed democratic.
The purpose of this course is to explore the concept of democracy, its various definitions and justifications. With this aim in mind, the course is structured as follows. We will first address the method of normative political theory. Secondly, we will analyse different conceptions of democracy, starting with a historical overlook and then focusing on the contemporary well-known divide between aggregative and deliberative democracy. Third, we will explore some accounts of deliberative democracy, identify the justifications they put forward and distinguish between so-called instrumental and procedural approaches. Fundamental authors in normative political theory will be addressed in readings and discussed in class. When possible, theoretical distinctions will be applied to existing democratic institutions through historical and current examples. The hope is that students will acquire the critical toolkit and sensitivity that are required not only to analyse existing countries' democratic institutions but also to understand and critically assess their desirability.
At the end of this course students will be able to:
1. Summarize, compare and critically assess various accounts of democracy
2. Apply various accounts of democracy to democratic institutions
3. Critically assess different accounts of democratic legitimacy and their justifications
Chiara DESTRI
Séminaire
English
No previous knowledge is necessary to attend this course, but familiarity with fundamental concepts of normative political theory is welcome. To this end, two mandatory readings for the introductory session are recommended before taking the first class.
Spring 2021-2022
Students are expected to attend class and to actively participate in the discussion. Questions are always welcome. Each class will have a required number of readings to do beforehand. For each new session (except for the first session), I will share two or three questions on the readings that students are invited to answer in order to assess their comprehension of the text. Students are expected to hand in their answers twice during the course and these answers will be part of students' final evaluation. They can do so by sending an e-mail to the teacher at least 24 hours before the following class. Each student will take part in at least one group presentation on recommended readings and is expected to discuss fellow students' presentations.
Classes will be organised as follows: the first half hour will be dedicated to questions from the previous session as well as to introduce the topic of the day; the following hour and a half will be devoted to group presentations and discussion. At the end of the course, a brief essay (4000 words) on one of the course topics will be handed in. Students are encouraged to prepare a first draft during the course and to discuss it with the teacher before handing in the final version. Late assignments will not be accepted.
Formative assessment:
1. Attendance, active participation and answers to teacher's questions (20%)
2. Group presentation and discussion (30%)
3. Final essay first draft
Summative assessment:
1. Final essay (4000 words) (50%)
Christine Korsgaard, The Normative Question, in Christine Korsgaard, The Sources of Normativity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996, 7-21
Recommended readings: Hannah Arendt, Philosophy and Politics, SOCIAL RESEARCH, Vol. 57(1), 1990, 73-103; Isaiah Berlin, Does Political Theory Still Exist?, in Isaiah Berlin, Concepts and Categories: Philosophical Essays [Vol.2], London: Hogarth Press, 19
Jon Elster, 1986, The Market and the Forum: Three Varieties of Political Theory, in Jon Elster and Aanund Hylland (eds.), The Foundations of Social Choice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 103-132